Posts Tagged ‘Shareholders’

The Effect of Inflation on Reported Profits

Sunday, November 27th, 2011


Inflation distorts the reported profits of business by making them appear to be much higher than they really are. Partly, this is because the purchasing power of each dollar of profits has been severely eroded by rapidly rising costs of capital goods. Another problem has been the accounting practices used by business (and required by the government) which have overstated profits by including in reported profits substantial amounts of funds that are not truly profits – rather, they are required to replace inventories and depreciated assets at prices made much higher by inflation.

Thus, much of the apparently high profits of highly inflationary periods such as the 1970′s is not really “profits”

the sense of being available for dividends to shareholders or, more important, for new capital investment. As a result, the reported profits of business during the 1970′s were largely an illusion created by inflation, and capital investment lagged despite an apparently strong profit picture.

 

Midtown Ford Winnipeg Facebook

San Diego Oceanfront Condo

http://www.forexforexforexforex.com/

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Inflation – Adjusted Rates of Return on Shareholder’s Equity

Saturday, November 19th, 2011


 Inflation   Adjusted Rates of Return on Shareholders Equity

 

(1) The break in the series is attributable to the incorporation of benchmark revisions and changes in sampling procedures. 1979 data correspond to the average of the first three quarters.

(2) Apart from the removal of inflation-related biases, the following adjustments have also been made: double-counting, which originates when financial statements containing inter-affiliate shareholders are aggregated, was removed; deferred tax liabilities were reclassified as equity; because rates of return relate only to the profitability of Canadian operations, foreign assets and associated income and expenses were removed from financial statements.

The ability of business to finance expansion out of retained earnings. Figure 15-9 shows the extent of this problem by presenting both reported profits and inflation-adjusted profits after taxes, expressed as a rate of return on shareholder's equity. Note that not only were the inflation-adjusted profits far lower than the reported profits, but also that the exaggeration of reported profits became much worse in the inflationary 1970's, as the reported rate of return increased while the real (inflation-adjusted) rate of return declined.

 

Midtown Ford Winnipeg Blog

San Diego Mission Beach Condo Rentals

http://www.forexforexforexforex.com/

 

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • Basic Fixed Income Portfolio Management For Market Timers There's been a lot of talk lately about a "bond bubble."  And after the decade we've had, investors can perhaps be forgiven if they get a little frightened at the mention of the Big Bad "B" Word. So what's the...
  • The Mortgage Crisis and Investments in Real Estate According to regional and state real estate analysts, the factors which previously fueled the housing boom of the last few years are easy to explain. The factors that fueled this boom in the real instate industry ranged significantly, including: -...
  • Pay Down Variable HELOC or Fixed Mortgage? Whenever I have a money question, I go to Cash Commons. There, users ask and answer all sorts of questions in a very helpful way. When I received this question, it seemed like a matter of opinion, so I wanted...
  • My Last Income Tax Update (hopefully) I have given the readers of this blog an insight into my taxes, so I felt the need to give a conclusion to my income tax “situation” (yes, it has been upgraded to a situation).  These past updates include: Meeting...


The Voting Right

Sunday, June 26th, 2011


Because common shareholders are the owners of the firm, they are accorded the right to vote for the board of directors and on all other major issues. Common shareholders may cast their ballots as they see fit on a given issue, or they may assign the power to cast their ballots to management or to some other group interested in assembling a block of votes.

As mentioned in the previous section, some corporations have different classes of common stock with unequal voting rights. There may be non-voting stock. For example, Canadian Tire Corporation, a retailer of a variety of automotive, sports, and household items, has both non-voting Class A and voting common shares. The Class A shares have been issued over the years to augment the company’s equity without diluting the controlling ownership. In 1983 the three children of co-founder Alfred Billes borrowed $76.6 million to buy a second 30 percent stake from the other co-founder’s estate. A subsequent splitting of one common share into one voting common share and four Class A non-voting shares allowed the Billes family heirs to maintain control over the company while at the same time paying down the debt acquired to keep control of the corporation in the family. Thus, the owners of 60 percent of the 3,450,000 voting common shares controlled the company despite the fact there were over 80 million Class A non-voting shares as of 1987. The Class A and common shares get essentially the same treatment in terms of dividends and priority of claims in the event of liquidation. So that they have some representation in corporate policy making, the holders of the Class A shares, voting separately as a class, are entitled to select the greater of three directors or one fifth of the total number of the corporation’s directors.

The Canadian Tire case was a well-publicized example demonstrating the potential dangers of non-voting shares. In the Canadian Tire situation there is a clause whereby Class A non-voting shares become voting shares if a tender offer is made to purchase voting common shares and a majority of those are tendered. In December 1986 the Canadian Tire franchised dealers, who already owned 17.4 percent of the common shares, and members of the Billes family committed to tender that portion of their interests. Even though the dealers would have owned 66 percent of the voting stock if their offer succeeded, their legal advisers judged the offer would not trigger the voting if their offer succeeded, their legal advisers judged the offer would not trigger the voting conversion for the Class A shares. This attempt to take advantage of a loophole in the wording of the clause, supposedly there to protect the rights of the Class A shareholders, incensed many investors and investment professionals alike. As a result the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) held hearings into the transaction.

http://www.forexforexforexforex.com/

Mainstay Suites Winnipeg

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • The Potential Problems With The Shared Web Hosting Nowadays there are tons of website hosting companies (Hostgator for example) offering unbelievable hosting packages which are able to cater all categories of usage. Due to great competition, the quality and service provided seems to be improved from time to...
  • Warren Buffett Now Works For Me! I finally purchased my first share of Berkshire Hathaway today. Yes, its only 1 share but at $4,700 per share you want to ease into this sort of investment! BRK has two classes of shares. The A-class share (BRK-A) which...
  • Time for Microsoft to Go Hostile This weekend Microsoft withdrew their bid to buy out Yahoo! for $31/share. They reportedly look the offer as high as $33/share, but Yahoo! was looking to get $37/share. Now in premarket trading, Yahoo! shares are down over 20% at around...
  • Ten Things I Hate About Monster.com's Job Search I decided to bite the bullet and begin the job search again. The first step in this process was to update my Monster.com resume. I had forgotten about all the negative things that come with that simple action. I know...


Common and Preferred Stock Financing

Sunday, June 12th, 2011


Election of the members of the board of directors may occur through the familiar majority voting system or by cumulative voting method. Under majority voting any group of shareholders owning more than 50 percent of the common stock may elect all of the directors. Under cumulative voting it is possible for those who hold less than a 50 percent interest to elect board members. The provision for some minority interest representation on the board is important to those who wish to reserve the right to challenge the prerogatives of the management.

In the cumulative voting process, a shareholder gets one vote for each share of stock he or she owns times one vote for each director to be elected. The shareholder may then accumulate votes in favor of a specified number of directors.

Take, as an example, a situation in which 10,000 shares are outstanding, you own 1,001 shares, and nine directors are to be elected. Your total number of votes under a cumulative system would be:

Number of shares………………….. 1,001

Number of directors to be elected……9

Number of votes……………………. 9,009

Now let us consider the situation where you cast all of your ballots for only one director of your choice. With nine directors to be elected, there is no way you can be stopped from creating one of the nine highest vote getters. Since you own 1,001 shares, the maximum number of shares a majority interest could control would be 8,999. This would entitle that group to 80,991 votes.

Number of shares owned (majority)……….8,999

Number of directors to be elected…………………9

Number of votes (majority)………………….80,991

These 80,991 votes cannot be spread thinly enough over nine candidates to stop you from electing your one director. For example, if they are spread evenly over nine choices, each of the majority’s directoral picks will receive 8,999 votes while your choice will receive 9,009 votes. Because the top nine vote getters are elected, your candidate will claim a director position.

To determine the number of shares needed to elect a given number of directors under a cumulative voting, the following formula is used:

formula 300x55 Common and Preferred Stock Financinghttp://www.forexforexforexforex.com/

Comfort Inn Winnipeg

Power Duct Cleaning

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • Current US Debt Ceiling Levels and Next Vote This spring of 2011, United States Congress will vote on whether or not to raise the debt ceiling.  What is the US debt ceiling? The debt ceiling refers to the total cap on U.S. borrowing through Treasury issuances of debt,...
  • My Risky Private Stock Investment Pays Off... Sort of Before I started this blog, I was a software engineer. Seven years ago, almost to the day, I signed on to become employee #7 at a new start-up and, like many start-ups, I put in long hours designing much of...
  • The Minnesota Senate Race Mess Just like Florida in 2000, the state of Minnesota is gearing up for a recount.  Not for the presidential election, but rather its U.S. Senate Race between Norm Coleman and Al Franken.  Right now the margin is a mere 206...
  • Election 2010 Early Voting: What The Numbers Mean for Republicans, Democrats To read our full analysis of how and why Republicans will take the Senate, click HERE. Our Election Center database is building, check it out HERE.  Be sure to explore the pages for Senate, House, and Gubernatorial races.  With the Election...


Natural Monopolies

Sunday, October 3rd, 2010


Despite the criticisms of monopolies, there are certain industries in which monopoly is the only logical form of organization. The best examples of this are public utilities and services: the public interest would not be served by having a dozen different companies providing gas, water, electricity, telephone service and local public transportation. The situation would be simply chaotic, which is why such industries are sometimes referred to as natural monopolies.

While monopoly is the only logical situation in such industries, there would be dangers in leaving such economic power in the hands of private businesses. As a result, natural monopolies are typically either nationalized (placed under government ownership and operation) or subjected to regulation of their prices. Sometimes their rates (prices) are regulated in such a way to permit the company to earn a certain rate of return on its shareholder’s investment, so as to be fair to both consumers and shareholders.

Many people believe that when natural monopolies are regulated by the government or by a board, these monopolies are therefore subject to control by the public. However, the matter or regulating monopolies is not as quite as simple as that. In order to regulate reasonably the prices to be charged by a natural monopoly, the people responsible for determining the regulations must possess considerable knowledge concerning that industry.

http://www.forexforexforexforex.com/

Capital Car Auto Dealer Transport Carriers

overtimeautoapprovals.com

24hourautofinance.com

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • Learn How To Employ Blogging To Develop Your Web Business Every online business, regardless of the niche, should have a blog these days in order to reach out to its target market. These tips are designed to help you get more from your blogging experience and build your brand better...
  • How to Determine if Rare Coin Prices Are Fair Having a great coin collection is something many people aspire to have. The objective for many is to have a collection of a certain kind of coin or a certain region of the world. Others will simply want to have...
  • Are You Sinking In Quicksand? Fear Holding You Back? Fear Is The Leading Cause Of  Failure It's doesn't matter what you are doing online, if you don't believe in yourself your vision will never be realized.  The first step to overcoming your fear is to admit you have them. ...
  • Should the USPS Become Its Own Business? America is the home of capitalism. If someone can do the same job for a better price, they're going to come out ahead. Why would anyone spend more for the same service? For a capitalistic nation, we have some weird...


New Terms

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010


Sole Proprietorship - A business firm owned (and usually managed) by a single person who bears full legal liability for the firms debts.

Partnership – A business firm owned by two or more persons, with each person bearing full legal liability for the firm’s debts.

Corporation – A business firm which is a separate legal entity from its owners, or shareholders, each of whose liability is limited to the amount of his or her investment in the firm.

Conglomerate – A group of seemingly unrelated types of corporations controlled in varying degrees by a central management group, through “holding companies” which own shares in those corporations.

Crown Corporation – A corporation owned by a government, being ultimately responsible, through a cabinet minister, to that government.

Proxy – A legal instrument whereby a shareholder’s right to vote at shareholder’s meetings is delegated to another person, either with or without specific instructions as to how that vote will be exercised.

Board of Directors – A group of people elected by the shareholders of a corporation to provide direction to the management of the corporation.

http://www.forexforexforexforex.com/

ForexForexForexForex

Winnipeg High Efficiency Furnace Service

Quality Inn Winnipeg Extended Stay Hotel

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • The Best Story in Rare Coin Collecting There are many reasons why a coin will become rare and collectible. It may be that it was a commemorative coin which was intended to be rare and instantly collectible. It can also be because the coin was taken out...
  • Some Good Corporate Blogs It has become popular for businesses and companies of all types to express interest in creating a business blog so that they can better communicate with other companies, their customers, and a variety of other target markets out there. By...
  • Do You Live Within Your Means? Are you living within your means? Are you guilty of lifestyle inflation? What does this mean? Living with your means is something that our generation is really struggling with. We are all guilt of this. Instead of stress about this,...
  • Own Business In The World Web System If you are going to start on-line business, I would like to advice you a sale of digital goods through the Internet. Electronic commerce - form of delivery of production. Thus as buyers of goods (or services) are both private...